VISITS

Monday, 28 January 2013

Being a judge - a deeper journey into whisky then expected, she said...

SHE SAID:  There is nothing worse then catching a really bad cold to stop one dead in her tracks especially when it comes to writing/blogging, which is what happened to this Lassie.  I got really sick on December 26th until  January 13th. Many a day was spent lying on the couch pondering the best way to just die but apparently I was actually one of the luckier ones as I didn't get any infections or pneumonia.  The morning of the 13th as I looked around the house and my wo"man" cave where all my whisky stuff is, I noticed piles and piles of "things" that needed to be done. Needless to say I fell extremely behind everywhere.  


4275 KM TREK!
To make matter worse from a writing perspective ONLY, I was to board a plane at 5:00am on January 17th bound for British Columbia, Canada for the 8th annual Victoria Whisky Festival.  So I stared at my unfinished blog, sighed and put the writing aside for yet a few more days in order to get organized before I left.  I was excited about my trip and couldn't wait to get there for several reasons:  A) The main reason I was attending the festival, B) getting out of the -35C weather home and C) the well needed time off from my day job.  So what was the main reason I attending this prestigious Whisky Festival some 4200km away from home: Because I was fortunate enough to be a judge for the 2012 Canadian Whisky Awards.  Now, for those of you who are not familiar, I'll briefly describe that it's a fairly new competition that is ONLY open to whiskies having been distilled in Canada. The judges are all writers/bloggers with a keen interest in Canadian whiskies and the entire country is well represented from East to West Coast.  For more information about the awards format you can click here:  http://www.canadianwhisky.org/news-views/canadian-whisky-awards-2011.html
As most competitions of this nature go the judges are kept secret until the actual award date and the samples are tested blind (only numbers appear on the sample bottles when received).  A detailed scoring sheet is given to each judge with a list of criteria and there is absolute radio silence during the process, going as far as ensuring the judges do not discuss any scores among themselves. As I picked up my box of samples mid November, I was a bit surprised at the size.  When I put it down on the table and opened it I was truly in awe and almost immediately a bit overwhelmed as I began to count how many samples I would be reviewing.

I had 30 days to nose/sample and score almost 60 samples. WOW!  I was extremely excited and started to plan how I would go about accomplishing this very large undertaking.  I had done blind tastings before, but never like this!  I set out and decided I would start by tackling a flight of 5 randomly chosen samples per night and give them an initial label of fail, poor, average, good, great or excellent.  That took 12 days.  Next level was to place the ones I thought were in the same category and put them in flights of five against each - another 12 days.  Some changed groups either moving up or down whereas some stayed the same.  Once I was convinced I had them in their proper groups I spent the next 7 days doing what I would consider speed rounds.  3 flights of 3 per day (nose/taste/spit/score) then a few randoms against each other as a final check.  So if I thought one ranked an 85, then I went back to my list and compared it against something else that I had ranked an 85.  Overall it was a tedious, long and in some cases very difficult job especially with "real life" always present and looming around.  Once done and happy with my methodology and scores I sent off my results to the head judge and then waited...

It's funny the things that went through my head after that.  Nervous/scared that I would make a fool out of myself; after all some of the judges had much more experience then I did and I was the new kid.  What if I didn't know anything at all?  What if my scores were way off compared to everyone else's? What if I was too harsh?  Too generous?  What if....?  I thought of them all, worried and fretted.  Why? Because I wanted to do well. Because deep down I needed to know that my nose is as good as I truly think it is.  I started to compare myself to some people that appear on American Idol or Next big star who really "think" they can sing and come to find out they are completely tone deaf.  OMG!?  I was torturing myself...  Back and forth. Then I simply let go.  Whatever happened, would happen.  I came to terms with it and realized that my nose is mine, my methodology works for me and that's what truly matters.  End of story. 
Christmas came, then the flu, then the new Year so it's not like I lost any sleep on finding out the results. A few days before the show I got "the email". Results were in and I sat staring at the unopened message on the screen sitting in my pj's drinking coffee.  With one click, all would be revealed.  Was I an idiot who couldn't sniff her way out of a paper bag soaked in Gibson's 18 or would I stand shoulder to shoulder with the rest of the judges? I scanned, looked across the spreadsheet and found my scores.  The names were not stated, so we don't know who gave what scores but I was able to compare my scores against the other 7 judges.  Elated, and relieved: I was ok.  There were very few areas where I was all by myself on a whisky.  One I noted I was almost 20 points below every other single judge and I know why.  I really didn't like that type of flavor profile, and I never do in any whisky that uses that finish style.  The rest, mostly, I was bang on or varied no more than 7 to 8 points away.  So with total relief and pride that I survived and wouldn't be the laughing stock of the Canadian Whisky World, I was ready for Victoria.  

The awards were very well organized and had a great turnout. It was truly an honor to meet the people behind the whiskies.  True pride in their hard work and product was demonstrated every time one of them accepted an award or medal. 
John Hall accepting Whisky of the year for Portwood Release
The atmosphere was jovial and there were many surprises. Now here is where my journey takes a strange turn into the deep.  I shook hands, I was there when pictures were snapped and I attended the after parties.  IT WAS AMAZING.  The dip into the deep and dark pool was the aftermath when I started tweeting and posting on social media about the CWA. I tweeted some photos, the website where the winners were announced, info about the process and judges, the whisky of the year and anything else that I was very proud of being a part of.  Ok Lassie spit it out what was the deep moment?

The dive into the deep end happened when I started receiving very negative comments on twitter and my facebook.  I still can't believe some of the things people either tweeted to me directly or indirectly as to how the awards were practically bogus, fixed, not warranted or that everybody seemed to win something.  I was a bit shocked that some of the comments were actually coming from people I would have considered "twitter friends".  BIG sigh...  

So try as I might to set the record straight for some nay-sayers:

1. NO JUDGES received any remuneration for doing this.  
2. NO JUDGES had their trips paid out to Victoria for the awards or anything related to the festival.  
3. NO JUDGES worked or represented industry or had any alliance with any distillery.
4. Samples were strictly kept secret, with nothing but a number on the bottle as an identifier. 
5. Nobody contacted me and I spoke to none about what I thought or scored, not even after the competition or awards.

How is it then possible that some of these "awards" or "medals" are so questionable?   I pondered how to handle this disappointment and what seemed like total disrespect from some people.  Then I realized something.  No other judge was saying anything to these people so what was I wasting my time for?  Well because I'm a newbie that's why and I let the negative people get to me. I may have a decent nose when it comes to whiskies but I have a lot yet to learn related to the other stuff that comes with the responsibilities of doing something which is my opinion is very important, being a good judge.  Canadian whisky is something to be proud of yet it's something most Canadians seem to be ignorant or ashamed of for some strange reason. "How can that whisky possibly win an award"? Really.........  ???

Mark Gillespie from Whisky Cast said it best when we did the virtual panel with him on January 20th. Canadians seem to have an inferiority complex when it comes to whiskies made in their own country. 

The virtual panel: http://www.whiskycast.com/files/WCVT/WCVT_0113.mp3 


Correct, it's not bourbon or scotch and I for one am glad it's not. Canadian whisky stands apart and I'm truly an advocate of that.  I had Canadian pride WAY before I was a judge (check this blog, Facebook or my twitter account), I especially had it during the Victoria Whisky Festival and I will have it FOR A LONG TIME TO COME.  Regardless of being a judge or anything else for that matter.  Canadian whisky is a passion of mine and if some choose to criticize instead of embrace they obviously don't see what I do.  There it was, the wow moment.  I "get it".  I am a true whisky geek, aren't I?  Not only is my nose in the right place, so is my heart.  How refreshingly and wonderfully ironic suddenly :)  **Lassie beamed! **

Being on the judging panel taught me that I had the capacity to accomplish this.  It reinforced that I should have faith and pride in my ability to nose the delicate qualities in some of our unique and beautiful Canadian made whiskies.  It allowed me the opportunity to stretch my boundaries and soar with some people I admire and very much respect:  Davin de Kergommeaux (THE Canadian expert and a Malt Maniac), Lawrence Graham - Malt Maniac, Mark Gillespie - Icon of the whisky fabric, and the rest of the judges which I didn't get to meet but share a common bond with now.  

The deep dive into the other stuff, well that's where the big lesson came.  I know not to take these things too seriously in the future and that nay sayer's and "haters" as my daughter would say are going to believe whatever they want even if you tell them the absolute truth.  I don't have anything to prove and in the long run my blog, my love and my passion for whisky will speak for itself.  I'm a true whisky geek and now I have the proof.  It was there all along I guess just needed to dive into the deep end to figure it out for myself. :)

I want to thank the Canadian Whisky Awards for entrusting me to be a judge this year.  It truly was a wonderful way to finish 2012 as well as start 2013.  

So, moving on...  Where does the whisky road take me next.. Tune in and find out, Victoria Whisky Festival blog is next and that will be a "Dram-hoot-t-nanny".  I'm pretty sure that's a word!


On the lovely, but freezing whisky trail (IT'S BLOODY WELL COLD HERE -23C with the windchill)...  

I remain the lovely, passionate but wiser Whisky Lassie 



17 comments:

  1. This is such a fantastic post! I love your writing style (and obviously your topics of choice!) ;) and this post is simply great. So glad you're feeling better health-wise and feeling good about where your palate ranks against other judges! It's a very strange position to be in... Can't wait to read your review of the festival!
    -Allison

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Allison! Sometimes I struggle to find my voice and where exactly I fit in the whisky fabric. Things get tossed around in my head and I think I'm writing "well" then I trash the whole thing and start from scratch because something didn't feel right. I love the "ah ha" moments, they mean the world to me and it's usually when I learn the most. I'm sure you can attest to these currently on your own whisky journey! Thanks for reading, I look forward to more of your posts as well.

      Delete
  2. what a journey! I enjoyed the ride from afar. Glad to get the insider's view. I am sorry you got some undeserved flack, really. But hey, keep on truckin'

    The rest of 2013 will have a hard time living up to january ;)

    Did you have the chance to try Roger's Chocolate, btw?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It wasn't me that got the flack per say, it was more just throwing out so much negativity about the awards and the whiskies. It was a bit disheartening. So, me and my "passionate" side stepped in a few times because I really do believe in what I say on my soap box. Plain and simple.

      Wait a minute, what is Roger's Chocolate???? :s

      Delete
  3. On behalf of Davin, who asked I post this due to technical issues:


    Hi Johanne,

    You were just great as a judge. I also saw some of the negative tweets but ignored them. I am sorry you were hurt by it. I learned long ago from the Malt Maniacs Awards that no matter what you do there are n'er-do-wells and folks who are absolutely determined to be unhappy who will criticize you. Mostly, I think they just wish they had thought of it first and are unhappy that someone else is getting some recognition. And more - if you give them more details they will find a way to twist them into something negative. My approach is that I NEVER invest any of my energy in negative thoughts or activities. I always try to stay positive.

    As I said on twitter, there are three kinds of people - those who do nothing, those who do something, and those who criticize those who do something. Margaret Atwood responded to a question about those who criticize her by saying that as soon as you put something out there you will draw criticism.

    Another thing I learned from the Malt Manias Awards is that companies want to win medals so they only send medal-worthy whiskies. This means there are proportionately a lot more winners than there are in a high school track meet where anybody who can stand up can enter the race. So be it. As judges we only see the cream of the crop and the results are obvious except to the cynics.

    You can tell a lot about people by what they accuse others of. People who cheat tend to think everyone else does too. People who don't cheat are always surprised when they learn others do. It's a characteristic of human nature to see your own motives in others.

    I know you had some anxiety and self-doubt when you were faced with all those bottles, and I know you would have liked some help and guidance. The reason you were left on your own and isolated was specifically to keep it 100% honest. Now that it is over, hold your head high and forget the negativity. I know it hurts when you thought they were your friends, but you performed admirably and you should be very proud of yourself.

    Davin

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Davin. I can only hope to emulate 1/10th of what I have learned from you. The isolation certainly forces one to be confident and keep moving forward. My personality is one that tends to face things dead on and I don't usually worry about things until after, once I start to process and do what I call a "port mortem". Either way, I am a proud Cananadian whisky weaver and will continue to promote, imbibe, share my love for all things "whisky"...

      Delete
  4. That sounds like a much more reasonable way to do judging. I've read about plenty of spirits festivals where judges are evaluating tens or hundreds of different expressions on the same day, which just boggles my mind. My palate tends to burn out after a handful, so I can't imagine trying to do that many in such a short amount of time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jordan, doing a flight of five every night was intense. I would spend 2-3 hours with the samples. I can't imagine doing 100's in one day!!! This was my methodology, I didn't even consider asking, in the aftermath, how the other judges did it? All I can say is, if you have the opportunity to do this at some point, go! Fabulous learning experience.

      Delete
  5. Johanne,

    Great post.Keep on doing things your way. Who really wants to go through life without ruffling a few feathers along the way. Especially in this industry. Everyone (including myself) thinks they are an expert and that their opinion is "correct" (whatever that means).

    I applaud you for your accomplishments. And cheers to your start to 2013.

    Michael

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Michael,

      I think that was the realization, it came a bit slowly but come to realize that it is correct, for me. I cannot wait to see what is next. :)

      Delete
  6. Yo Johanne!

    All I can say is WOW! I can't even imagine going through that many whiskies in such a short time. I'm lucky to be able to get through 2 sets of tasting notes on any given night.

    As far as the write up, great stuff all around! You got skills!

    Seeya on the interwebz...

    G-LO

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Sir! If ever you get to do this Angelo, DO IT! It was a grueling (to a newbie) but fantastic experience.

      J

      Delete
  7. I'm so moved and inspired by your experiences and your honest and introspective writing. First of all: kudos on the honour of being selected to play such an important role in an event so important to Canadian whisky. You have well earned it. Your methodology was impressively thorough. This blog post is a clinic on how to construct an extended blind ranking for your description of your methodology alone.

    But your story also fills me with jealousy. I'm jealous that you have tasted so many Canadian whiskies! I'm jealous that you got to meet Davin and Oliver and Mark G.! But even more than that, I'm jealous of Davin, Oliver and Mark G. that they got to meet you and dram with you and Graham. I seriously SERIOUSLY want to do that!

    Awesome post. You have the strength to be vulnerable. That's rare and precious. Power to you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Josh!

      You make me laugh, as always. I am sure when you are ready to come back to the fabric 100% many wonderful opportunities will open up to you. Meeting some of these people was certainly the highlight of my trip and sharing drams was even better!

      I am who I am and I think and feel it's important to demonstrate the journey in full for those who are either just starting their own or that might have their own fears/tribulations, etc...

      Thanks again!

      Johanne

      Delete
  8. Thanks for sharing your experience, Johanne. I too am jealous of your opportunity to taste so many diverse whiskies as well as judge them. (And I totally get how intimidating that must have been, but you carried it off with aplomb!) I can't imagine having all that negative fallout heaped on you but good on you for shutting it out and holding your head high. Davin's advice is solid and you should be reveling in the fun of this experience rather than paying attention to people who just want to drag you down. Way to go!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think they purposely sought me out to heap it on me, but because I spoke up there was suddenly "someone" to fuel the fire so to speak. Then again, that could entirely be my own opinion, lol. Either way, I learned just as much about myself through both good and bad. As for Davin's advice, it's always fabulous. He's been a fantastic mentor!

      Cheers,

      Johanne

      Delete